Hence, those with calculable prostate specific antigen doubling time may represent a select lower risk
group relative to all men with biochemical recurrence.
Materials and Methods: We compared clinical and pathological features between patients with and without calculable prostate specific antigen doubling time. We assessed time trends in the proportion with calculable prostate specific antigen doubling time in 535 patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy at 5 Veterans Affairs medical centers comprising the SEARCH (Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital) database between 1988 and 2003.
Results: Prostate specific antigen doubling time was not calculable in 187 patients (35%) due to secondary therapy in 155 (83%). With time the proportion of patients with calculable prostate specific antigen doubling time decreased significantly (p < 0.001). Adverse PU-H71 pathological features, more rapid time to recurrence, higher body mass index and differing MM-102 surgical centers were associated with not having a calculable prostate specific antigen doubling time. Of all men with recurrence in the most recent year of analysis the adjusted probability of having a calculable prostate specific antigen doubling time was only 43%, that is 61% in patients with favorable pathological results but only 30% in those with seminal vesicle
invasion.
Conclusions: Those with calculable prostate specific antigen doubling time represented a select, lower risk cohort and the proportion of patients with calculable prostate specific antigen doubling time decreased with time. This highlights the need for alternative markers in men with recurrent prostate cancer because one of our best current
markers, prostate specific antigen doubling time, is only available in a limited number of patients.”
“Purpose: In men with extracapsular disease or positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy immediate adjuvant therapy decreases the risk of biochemical recurrence at the cost of increased toxicity. We further stratified these men into a low risk group in which watchful waiting after surgery may be preferred and a high risk cohort in which adjuvant therapy may be preferred.
Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the records of 902 men treated with radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal-Access Regional Cancer Hospital Etomidate (SEARCH) database between 1988 and 2007 with positive surgical margins and/or extracapsular disease without seminal vesicle invasion or lymph node metastasis. The significant independent predictors of biochemical recurrence were determined using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Based on the recurrence risk generated from the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model we generated tables to estimate the risk of recurrence-free survival 1, 3 and 5 years after surgery.
Results: At a median of 3 years of followup, 346 patients (39%) had biochemical recurrence.