Thus, in Australia and New Zealand in 2005, live donor transplants accounted for 41% of the total transplants performed.
In comparison, although the number of deceased donor transplants performed was similar 10 years earlier in 1995 (348 in Australia and 70 in New Zealand), fewer live donor transplants were performed (94 in Australia and 24 in New Zealand), thus in 1995, live donor transplants accounted for only 22% of the total transplants performed.1 This progressive increase in the number of live donor transplants performed is indicative of the overall success of kidney transplantation as well as the increased confidence in using live donors. However, it also reflects the continued shortage of deceased donor organs. Since 2000, 12-month primary MI-503 deceased donor recipient
survival in Australia and New Zealand has been approximately 96%, and 12-month primary deceased donor graft survival has been approximately 92%.1 In comparison, 12-month primary https://www.selleckchem.com/products/Tigecycline.html live donor recipient survival has been approximately 99%, and 12-month primary live donor graft survival has been approximately 96%.1 Examining longer term results: recent 5-year primary deceased donor recipient survival has been approximately 87%, with 5-year primary deceased donor graft survival being approximately 80%. In comparison, 5-year live donor recipient survival has been approximately 94%, with 5-year live donor graft survival being approximately 86%. These recipient and graft survival outcomes for both deceased and live donation are excellent. Unadjusted figures show superior outcomes for live donor transplantation relative to deceased donor transplantation. Various studies have assessed the success of live donor kidney transplantation relative to the donor source (e.g. related, unrelated, spousal). In general, graft survival is excellent and equivalent regardless of whether the donor is related or
unrelated.2–5 Phosphoglycerate kinase Unmatched, unrelated live donor transplants show similar or superior results compared with deceased donor transplants.2–5 Gjertson and Cecka analyzed United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Registry data and found that 5-year graft survival rates for spousal, living unrelated and parental donation were all similar (75%, 72% and 74%, respectively).5 Graft half-lives were 14, 13 and 12 years, respectively.5 Mandal et al. analyzed USRDS data and compared primary deceased donor versus primary live donor transplantation for different age groups.6 The outcomes for recipients aged over 60 years (n = 5,142) demonstrated that live donation was always associated with a better outcome. Comparing deceased donor with live donor renal transplant in this older age group, the relative risk of death was 1.72 and the relative risk of graft failure was 1.64. Living donor renal transplantation for recipients aged 18–59 years was also generally associated with better outcomes compared with deceased donor renal transplantation.