Second, the statistical analysis plan specifies calculation of anti-JE PRNT geometric mean titers (GMTs) on all randomized subjects with valid anti-JE PRNT results. For those subjects with an anti-JE PRNT titer of less than the limit of detection

(those with a titer of <1:10), subjects would be assigned a value of 1:5 (one-half the limit of quantification) for the purposes of calculating GMTs. Because of reporting errors, subjects with an anti-JE PRNT titer <1:10 were incorrectly excluded from the dataset for the purpose of calculating GMTs. Thus, we now report corrected anti-JE GMTs including all subjects with valid results, including those with results less than the limit of detection, in revised Table selleck kinase inhibitor 2. Neither of these corrections changes the main conclusion in the original paper in Vaccine that measles vaccine and LJEV can be safely administered together without interference on the response to measles vaccine. In December 2007, the Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) reviewed the data from this study and determined that the short-term safety profile of LJEV was satisfactory and concurred that the vaccines could be safely coadministered [3]. Based on the

original reported small reduction in measles seroprotection rate postvaccination in the coadministration group as compared to that in the group where measles vaccine was given alone, and based on the significant reduction in measles antibody concentrations ATM Kinase Inhibitor solubility dmso in the coadministration

group, GAVCS concluded that the study results Thiamine-diphosphate kinase indicated that there may be some interference of LJEV on the response to measles vaccine. Because the anti-measles IgG GMC results were pivotal to the committee’s conclusion, we carefully reviewed the quantitative data and identified that they were not valid for the DSL kit which was originally used. Thus, we sought independent, expert advice and under their advisement retested study specimens using an appropriate measles ELISA. The corrected anti-measles IgG concentration data now demonstrate that the GMC results do not support a conclusion that LJEV has some interference on the response to measles vaccine. With this correction, we hope that the public health community will have more appropriate data for making policy-decisions about introduction of LJEV into immunization schedules in Asia. Revised Table 2 and corrected relevant sections of text are herein reproduced below. Serum samples were frozen at −70 °C and shipped by air on dry ice to the Center for Vaccine Development at Mahidol University in Bangkok, Thailand, for testing. Measles immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody was determined using the Enzygnost Anti-Measles Virus/IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits from Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products, GmbH, Marburg, Germany. Seroprotection after MV was defined as a measles antibody concentration ≥120 mIU/mL.