Unintentional injection rate of pancreatic duct was not significantly different between two groups. Mean size of CBD was not significantly different between asymptomatic and symptomatic group (11.4 ± 3.5 vs 10.5 ± 4.7, p = 0.165). Asymptomatic group experienced

significantly more post ERCP pancreatitis than symptomatic group (23.5% vs 7.8%, p = 0.049). There was no significant difference in post ERCP complications of bleeding, infection and perforation between two groups. Conclusion: Performing ERCP for removal of CBD stone in asymptomatic patients showed significantly increased risk of post ERCP pancreatitis. Key Word(s): 1. endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography complication common bile duct stone Presenting Author: TAE NYEUN KIM Additional Authors: KOOK HYUN KIM, KYEONG OK KIM, SI HYUNG LEE, BYUNG IK JANG Corresponding Author: TAE NYEUN Torin 1 datasheet KIM Affiliations: Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine Objective: Endoscopic common bile duct stone removal is relatively difficult in

patients with a history of Billroth-II gastrectomy and endoscopic sphincterectomy (ES) with conventional sphincterotome Enzalutamide research buy may increase complication risks. The aims of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) in patients with B- II gastrectomy. Methods: A review of 53 patients with a history of B-II gastrectomy who underwent

ERCP for treatment of common duct stones from January 2010 to December 2012 were conducted retrospectively. Patietns with hepatobiliary cancer, pancreatic cancer, common bile duct stricture and concomitant pancreatitis were excluded. Results: Of 53 patients, 31 patients were enrolled. The median age was 70.2 ± 7.1 years and male to female ratio was 2.9:1. Patients who underwent ES or EPLBD for management of CBD stones were 16 and 15, respectively. Florfenicol Mechanical lithotripsy was performed in 7 patients (4 in ES group, 3 in EPLBD group). The median size of balloon was 11.3 ± 1.4 mm (range 10–15 mm). The median duration of balloon expansion was 33.1 ± 14.0 s (range 20–60 s). The overall stone removal rate was 96.8% (30/31). Overall incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 0%. Post-ERCP bleeding occurred in 1 patient within EPLBD group. No significant difference in the incidence of post-ERCP bleeding was observed between the two groups (p = 0.48). Cholangitis was not observed in this study. Conclusion: EPLBD seems to be an effective and safe procedure for CBD stone removal in patients with billroth II gastrectomy. Key Word(s): 1.