The Micronaut™ system has also proven to be invaluable in the characterization of otherwise
untypable new species. However, reference and new strains should always be tested in the same series because the differences in oxidative metabolic profiles may not only be qualitative but also quantitative. Biodiversity of Brucella spp. also reflects taxonomic (natural and evolutionary) relationships that exist between and among the organisms sequestered and Sapanisertib clustered within the classification scheme. Hence, the Micronaut™ system is not only a diagnostic assay it can be a striking tool in functional taxonomy of the genus Brucella. Our results may raise the question if the widely accepted biotyping scheme based on only a few phenotypic features is sufficient to get a clear idea of the true composition of the genus Brucella and will meet future demands. The new diagnostic approach presented in this study may help to overcome these limitations. Methods Brucella strains Brucella spp. were characterized by classical microbiological
methods according to Alton et al. (1988) [2]. Comprehensive biochemical phenotyping was performed on the Brucella reference strains representing all currently known species and their biovars as well as on up to 7 field ��-Nicotinamide isolates per species S3I-201 concentration and biotype as far as available (Table 2). The consecutively established Brucella specific 96-well microtiter plate was evaluated testing the reference strains and a broad range of Brucella isolates (a total of 113 strains) originating from various animal hosts and human patients, i.e. B. melitensis bv 1 (n = 8), bv 2 (n = 14) and bv 3 (n = 11); B. abortus bv 1 (n = 9), bv 2 (n = 2), bv 3 (n = 5), bv 4 (n = 6), bv 5 (n = 1), bv 6 (n = 3), bv 7 (n = 1) and bv 9 (n = 3); B. suis bv 1 (n = 6), bv 2 (n = 8), bv 3 (n = 1), bv 4 (n = 2) and bv 5 (n = 1); B. canis (n = 5), B. ovis (n = 4), B. neotomae (n = 1), B. pinnipedialis (n = 8) and B. ceti (n = 1), B. microti (n = 10), B. inopinata (n = 1), Alectinib mw and two atypical
strains according to the hitherto existing biotyping scheme (Table 2). Isolates of diverse geographical origin were deliberately selected to gain a large variety of strains. Table 2 Brucella strains tested for metabolic activity. Species Biovar Strain Culture collection Host Number of field isolates Taxa Profile™ (570 substrates) Micronaut™ Brucella plate (93 substrates) 1 544 NCTCa 10093 Cattle 6 8 2 86/8/59 NCTC 10501 Cattle 1 1 3 Tulya NCTC 10502 Human 4 4 B. abortus 4 292 NCTC 10503 Cattle 5 5 5 B3196 NCTC 10504 Cattle 0 0 6 870 NCTC 10505 Cattle 3 2 7* 63175 NCTC 10506 Cattle 0 0 9 C68 NCTC 10507 Cattle 2 2 1 16 M NCTC 10094 Goat 4 7 B. melitensis 2 63/9 NCTC 10508 Goat 5 13 3 Ether NCTC 10509 Goat 4 10 1 1330 NCTC 10316 Swine 4 5 2 Thomsen NCTC 10510 Swine 6 7 B. suis 3 686 NCTC 10511 Swine 1 0 4 40 AFSSAb Ref. 40 Reindeer 1 1 5 513 AFSSA Ref. 513 Wild rodent 0 0 B. canis RM6/66 NCTC 10854 Dog 4 4 B.