One effect of this high chlororespiratory activity in diatoms is that the F M level of dark-adapted diatoms is lower than the F M′ observed under low actinic light (Cruz et al. 2010). This means that it is not possible to apply the commonly used NPQ equation: $$ \textNPQ AMN-107 ic50 = \fracF_\textM F_\textM ‘ – 1, $$ (1)since the calculated value would be negative [F M < F M′]. A practical solution for this problem is the determination of the light-response curve (see Question 18) and to replace F M by the maximum F M′

level measured (F M′max; Serôdio et al. 2006) in Eq (1): So, $$ \textNPQ\; = \;\fracF_\textM \hboxmax ^\primeF_\textM ‘ – 1. $$ (2) In this AZD1152 cost way, NPQ values will always be positive and approach a minimum value close to zero under conditions closely corresponding to a state with a very small transthylakoid proton gradient. Question 18. Can the time that is needed for a complete quenching analysis be shortened? To characterize the properties of parameters such as qP, Φ

PSII [= (F M′ − F S′)/F M′] and NPQ, it is common practice to determine the light intensity dependence of these parameters (see e.g., Bilger and Björkman 1991; Gray et al. 1996; Verhoeven et al. 1997). The classical approach is to illuminate the leaf at each light intensity, until steady state is reached (see Questions 2.3 and 10). This process can be quite time-consuming, especially if the fluorescence quenching analysis is performed for field experiments. To reduce the time needed for this type of measurement, a faster procedure was developed and called rapid light curves (RLCs) (White and Farnesyltransferase Critchley 1999; Ralph and Gademann 2005). RLCs can be used to study the physiological flexibility of the photochemistry in response to rapid changes in irradiation (Guarini and Moritz 2009). Such changes occur frequently in natural environments. An RLC is a plot of the electron transport rate (ETR: Φ PSII × PFD × 0.5 × leaf absorptivity coefficient) as a function of the actinic light intensity,

which is applied for fixed short-time periods (e.g., 10 s or 1 min). Here, PFD stands for photon flux density, and here, it is assumed that the PSI:PSII ratio is 1:1. However, this is only a rough approximation and the real ratio will differ between samples (see Question 26). For this type of analysis, two criteria are important: (1) the samples must be dark adapted, and (2) photosynthesis must be induced [activation of the Calvin–Benson cycle enzymes that become inactive during incubation in darkness (see Question 6)] before the measurement sequence is started (White and Critchley 1999). Dark adaptation of the samples allows the determination of the reference F O and F M values needed for the Proteasomal inhibitors calculation of qN and/or NPQ.