meliloti, we detected the presence of this species in all environment analyzed

(soil, nodules and plant aerial tissues). This finding is confirming earlier reports on the ability of S. meliloti to behave as an endophytic strain, colonizing all plant compartments, besides being a root symbiont of legumes [22], and suggest a potential higher genetic variability of S. meliloti population, and, from the other side, potential new ecological VX-765 in vivo and functional roles for this species, not investigated so far[29, 51, 52]. Unfortunately, the low population size of S. meliloti in stems and leaves and the possible presence of PCR inhibitors (plant DNA or phenolic compounds, for instance) did not permit the amplification of 16 S-23 S rRNA intergenic region from plant aerial parts to obtain information about the genetic diversity and structure of S. meliloti population resident in plant aerial part. No hypothesis

could then be drawn about the relationships between this population and those of soil and nodules. Concerning S. meliloti populations present in soil and nodules, similar values for diversity were detected in nodules and in soil, suggesting that both environments harbor a consistent fraction of the population’s genetic diversity. Interestingly, most of the T-RFs were detected in one sample only, and a very small fraction of T-RFs was shared among all samples, though the original soil material was homogeneous and should, in theory, contain the same S. meliloti haplotypes. AZD6244 in vitro Therefore, S. meliloti populations from all the three mesocosms investigated were highly differentiated between each other and, as expected from previous studies on S. meliloti[23] and on Bradyrhizobium[53], no statistically significant plant genotype- related haplotypes were detected. A possible explanation of such findings could be linked to the relatively low titers of S. meliloti in soil (104-105 cells/g), which Rucaparib datasheet is roughly 1/10,000 of the total bacterial community of soil (estimated at ~109 16 S rRNA gene copies/g of soil by qPCR, data not shown). Such estimated S. meliloti

titers were similar to those previously observed in other soil and plant tissues [35] and in line with those normally found in soil with viable (Most Probable Number, MPN) estimates [26, 54]. As a consequence of this low population size, check details founder effect and genetic drift are likely to be among the main shaping forces of S. meliloti population in this experimental set-up, perhaps permitting the fixation of sample-specific haplotypes by simple chance [55]. Regarding the nodule-soil relationships, though our experiments did not directly address this issue, the reported S. meliloti population analysis suggests the presence of somewhat nonoverlapping soil and nodule population fractions, even if no specific patterns of soil and nodule populations were detected.