Contrary to previous results with roGFP, the optimized roGFP1_iE and roGFP1_iL constructs were not completely oxidized, and are therefore useful

sensors for monitoring the ER under conditions when it is even more oxidized. The development of methods for the visualization of disulfide bond formation and the analysis of redox conditions in different cell compartments of living cells has been on the rise for years. Because of the bright and visible fluorescence, variants of green fluorescent protein (GFP) represent attractive reporters for in vivo applications, as they allow noninvasive redox monitoring at the single-cell level. Redox-sensitive fluorescent proteins (roGFP, rxYFP) were produced by substitution of surface-exposed ZD1839 price cysteine residues of GFP, resulting in the formation of a disulfide bond without destroying the structure of the protein (Dooley et al., 2004; Ostergaard et al., 2004). The available redox-sensitive GFPs vary in their excitation and emission wavelength, and their

ratiometric Alectinib behavior. The oxidation state of these GFP-based redox sensors is specifically sensitive to the redox pair of reduced and oxidized glutathione (GSH/GSSG), but not to thioredoxin (Ostergaard et al., 2001; Meyer et al., 2007). Glutathione is considered to be the major thiol/disulfide redox buffer of the cells and participates in detoxification, protection from oxidative damage and formation of native disulfide bonds (recently reviewed by Meyer et al., 2007). Usually, the concentration of glutathione in the cell is rather high

(5–10 mM), but the ratio between GSH and GSSG differs among cellular compartments: while the cytosol exhibits a GSH : GSSG ratio of up to 100 : 1, MYO10 the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is more oxidizing, with a ratio of 10 : 1 (Hwang et al., 1992). However, the accurate quantification of glutathione ratios within different organelles has serious limitations; thus, the optimization of redox-sensitive GFPs as biosensors that can be targeted to different cellular compartments gains even more importance (Bjornberg et al., 2006). Studies of recent years have shown that these indicators function efficiently within reducing compartments such as cytosol and the mitochondria (Hanson et al., 2004; Schwarzer et al., 2007), but show deficiencies when used in more oxidizing environments such as the ER. Probably the high thermodynamic stability of the disulfide bond introduced is responsible for this problem, which has made a quantitative analysis of more oxidizing compartments impossible so far (Lohman & Remington, 2008). The ER provides an oxidizing environment that is highly optimized for the folding of proteins. The formation of disulfide bonds in proteins is attained through the oxidative protein folding machinery, including protein disulfide isomerase Pdi1 and its oxido-reductase Ero1, in which the enzymic glutathione pathway is also involved (reviewed in Tu & Weissman, 2004).