7b). The reverse is true for NPQ. The bottom panel of Fig. 7a shows that the quantum efficiency for fluorescence and photophysical decay (Φf,D) responds to the light treatment and Selleck Blasticidin S decreases with exposure time. ΦNPQ values are lower and respond in the opposite way to Φf,D. After an initial decrease values increase throughout the light phase. The sum of both parameters equals one, showing that the calculations of ΦNPQ and Φf,D are valid. Similar observations were made when consecutive increasing light was applied (Fig. 8). ΦNPQ and Φf,D respond in a converse fashion. Light exposure and increases in the

PF elevated Φf,D, but decreased ΦNPQ. At high PF ΦNPQ responses were limited while Φf,D increased, suggesting that Φf,D represents an active photoregulatory mechanism, even when ΦNPQ appears to be at the end of its regulatory capacity. Φf,D resembles the functional absorption Tariquidar manufacturer cross section in the block light treatment (Fig. 7b), but not when the light is increased stepwise (Fig. 8b). Fig. 7 Analysis of quenching yields subjected to a block light Selleckchem CX-6258 treatment (data Fig. 2). a Top panel NPQ calculated using the Stern–Volmer equation ((F m  − F m ′)/F m ′), and as \( \textNPQ_\sigma_\textPSII \) ((σPSII − σPSII′)/σPSII′). Bottom panel regulated NPQ (ΦNPQ) and constitutive

NPQ plus fluorescence (Φf,D) and the sum of all quantum efficiencies (ΦNPQ + Φf,D + ∆F/F m ′). b Relationship between σPSII (bottom X-axis) and the two proxies for the NPQ (left Y-axis) or the quantum efficiency for constitutive NPQ (right Y-axis). As can be seen there is an excellent relationship between changes in σPSII and Φf,D, but not between changes in σPSII and changes in the “classical”

NPQ Fig. 8 Analysis of quenching yields subjected to a stepwise increase in irradiance (data Fig. 3). a Top panel NPQ calculated using the Stern–Volmer equation ((F m  − F m ′)/F m ′), and as \( \textNPQ_\sigma_\textPSII \) ((σPSII − σPSII′)/σPSII′). Bottom panel regulated NPQ (ΦNPQ) and constitutive NPQ (Φf,D). b Relationship between σPSII (bottom X-axis) Linifanib (ABT-869) and the two proxies for the NPQ (left Y-axis) or the quantum efficiency for constitutive NPQ (right Y-axis) Connectivity The parameter p describes the connectivity of PSII centres and migration of excitation energy from closed to open PSII. During the shift to HL (440 μmol photons m−2 s−1) p remained relatively constant at a value of approximately 0.25, and increased within 3 min to 0.34 when the light was turned off (not shown). However, when the light was increased in smaller steps, a considerable fluctuation in connectivity was observed. Connectivity decreased during the first minute after the dark–light, and the next light increment transition (PF of 0–50 μmol photons m−2 s−1, and 50–200 μmol photons m−2 s−1, respectively, Fig. 9a).