3D). To substantiate this finding, we performed passive EAE transfer experiments of in vivo primed Thy1.1 T cells into Thy1.2-depleted
Rag1−/− recipients, where we also could not detect any differences in disease progression after ILC depletion (Fig. 3E). In summary, our data suggest that during autoimmune neuroinflammation, Thy1+ ILCs do not play a critical role in disease development or progression. During the last decade, it became obvious that one of the most critical factors in many autoimmune pathologies is IL-23. Particularly in neuroinflammation, IL-23 has turned out to be a nonredundant factor, but the mechanism underlying its action is far from being understood. IL-23 RXDX-106 can trigger differentiation of αβ T cells toward IL-17-producing TH17 cells [18] and GM-CSF-producing T cells [30], but naïve T cells do not express the IL-23 receptor. In contrast, ILCs as well as γδ T cells have been shown to constitutively express IL-23R, and in the case of γδ T cells, a significant contribution to the pathogenesis of EAE [31] as well as psoriatic skin inflammation has been reported [21, 32]. Furthermore, the recent finding that intestinal ILCs via expression of MHC class II are able to regulate CD4 T-cell responses [33] further emphasizes their so far underestimated role in
the adult immune system. Along Fluorouracil concentration these lines, we hypothesized that ILCs, via their immediate responsiveness to IL-23 signals, contribute ALOX15 to autoimmune neuroinflammation. Further support for this hypothesis
came from the fact that ILCs are critical players in IL-23-driven innate gut inflammation [11]. Indeed, we could show that ILCs are not only present at mucosal surfaces as previously reported, but also in the CNS both during steady state and inflammation. Based on their surface marker profile, the majority of CNS-infiltrating ILCs resembled what had been categorized as RORγt-dependent, IL-17-producing group 3 ILCs [1, 6], with only a minor fraction resembling group 2 ILCs. However, the lineage releationships within the ILC family are only starting to be unraveled [22, 27, 34], and what is now considered to be a separate lineage might indeed only represent a different activation state. Interestingly, under inflammatory conditions, the majority of CNS-infiltrating ILCs ceased to express RORγt, in line with published work suggesting that during their differentiation certain ILC populations lose RORγt expression [27]. Of note, in this autoimmune colitis model, the RORγt and CD4-negative ILC population was causative for gut pathology [27]. It has also been proposed that expression of T-bet in RORγt+ ILCs can further modulate their fate and function, causing a switch from a homeostatic to a proinflammatory phenotype [35].