Cultural beliefs of illness, prescribed treatment and healthcare providers; poor amount of counselling and information given to patients. Providing patients’ education; improve provider–patient communication. problems with not taking medicines as advised; fear of dependency. Providing patient education and counselling; improve provider–patient communication; providing bilingual link workers. Perceptions of side effects and methods of coping; views and actions regarding the use of medicines; cognitive, physical and sensory problems affecting use of medicines; lack of information or understanding about use of medicines; problems

in services access. Involve patients in evidence-informed decision making for safer and more effective AC220 disease and medicine managements. Encourage pharmacists and patients to work together and share their experiences regarding the use of medicines and exchange information that will support patients in achieving optimal outcomes from their medications. Encourage effective communication between secondary and primary care and patients for the continuity of safe and effective therapy. Lack of information on medicines; intentional non-compliance; lack of monitoring and review of medicines. Pharmacy

lack of information or opportunity to discuss medication-related issues or concerns; language issues. Cultural and language issues; blind belief’ and not recognising the pharmaceutical role CH5424802 research buy of pharmacist; limited understanding of patients’ medicines. Cut, puncture, perforation or haemorrhage during medical care; systemic antibiotic affecting ANS and CVS. The electronic database search retrieved a total of 145 titles, of which two were duplicates. selleck products Screening of titles, abstracts

and/or full texts for the remaining 143 identified that six were related to MRPs.[15, 20, 23, 28-30] Manual screening of the journals retrieved one article[31] and a hand search of citations retrieved articles from the electronic database, and journals, which led to a further eight articles.[14, 21, 22, 32-36] Thus, 15 articles in total were included in this review. The summary of the literature review search process is illustrated in Figure 1. Twelve of the 15 studies examined patients’ perspectives on, and experiences of, the use of medicines in terms of views and actions regarding illness and the use of medicines.[14, 15, 20-23, 31-36] The remaining studies (n = 3) examined MRPs in terms of adverse drug reactions (ADRs)[28, 29] or adverse events (AEs).[30] The studies included: quantitative studies (n = 6);[21, 22, 30, 31, 33, 34] qualitative studies (n = 4);[20, 23, 35, 36] studies that combined quantitative and qualitative methods (n = 2);[14, 15] and systematic reviews (n = 2).